Our own responsibility consists in :

  • emphasizing what we believe could contradict sustainable development objectives in the management of environmental services. Thus, traditional remuneration for the provision of water based on volumes supplied must change to incorporate the objective to reduce water consumption, without disturbing the economic balance of an activity for which costs are very largely fixed;

  • highlighting the best organizational frameworks that we see in our international experience.
    For example, in the United Kingdom, an operator is made responsible for managing waste flows produced by a region, and for making changes to the system by significantly developing recycling and energy recovery.
    In the long term, such integrated contracts will enable increased responsibility and efficiency, unequalled elsewhere in the European Union.

  • recommending research on the breakdown of responsibilities between delegating authorities and operators.
    In the field of urban transportation, integrated management of the different segments and the implementation of genuine inter-modal means have become an entirely separate business distinguished from the simple management of transportation means. Its increasing complexity justifies the organising public authority in delegating this work to a specialised private manager. We are experimenting with new responsibilities based on this logic in contracts in the Netherlands and the United States.
    Responsibilities granted to private operators in developed countries have been increasingly broken down into segments and contract durations have been shortened over the last two decades, due to competition law.Nevertheless, in the developing world, it is generally accepted that the need to develop basic and essential services justifies longer contract duration and broader managerial responsibilities.

Contract

Recycling ratio
2008-2009

Recycling objective
fixed by the local authority
2011-2012

Nottinghamshire

37,8 %

45 %

Shropshire

37,9 %

53,4 %

Southwark

18,5 %

34,8 %

Achieving sustainable urban development objectives requires more consistent models and better-targeted responsibilities employed over the long term

At the present time, the obligation to manage climate change is creating a new challenge for efficiency and performance in the developed world. The objective is to propose in-depth changes to urban services, with the aim of achieving the reductions in GHG emissions identified by the Kyoto protocol. In all our activities, we believe that the basis for a solution lies in a public-private partnership. This is based on close public control over a responsible private manager paid partly on quality and service improvement objectives.

The need for a global and sustainable approach goes beyond the framework of each of our operational activities. Mobilization of urban districts, in terms of sustainable development, is significantly dominated by the will to reduce GHG emissions. It has become necessary to offer tools to local governments for them to objectively choose between the various possible actions.

The common carbon saving mechanism makes it possible to design technical-financial tools adapted to the characteristics of each region, so as to prioritize decisions with an impact on GHG emissions in different sectors of municipal management (transportation, heating and cooling networks, energy management of public buildings, public lighting, waste treatment, etc.), on the basis of an objective approach towards their financial cost/ ecological benefit ratio.